|
| print this
Correcting
Errors
This
article is written by nationally recognized historian
and oft-quoted Alcoholics Anonymous archivist Mitchell
K.
Before
continuing on with this series of articles about AA History
we would like to take this brief opportunity to respond
to a question asked by many of the readers. In fact, it
was the most prevalent question submitted to this writer.
The
question related to why some of the information contained
in the articles either could not be found in the AA Conference-Approved
Literature, or appeared to contradict that which is found
there. Most of the readers referred to AA Comes Of Age,
Dr. Bob and the Good Old-timers and Pass It On. Over the
past 20 years, several historians, non-AA members and AA
members alike have been delving into AA's history. The fascination
with AA as the greatest social and spiritual movement of
the 20th Century has grown in leaps and bounds, considering
its growth and success. A plethora of information has been
uncovered by these researchers, much of which reveals new
material or a "fine tuning" of already existing information.
Names,
dates and other "facts," backed up by solid documentation
show that some of the historical data contained within the
pages of AA Conference-Approved literature is not accurate.
Other data even sheds new light upon AA's History which
was hitherto unknown.
In
true historical research, the FACTS outweigh the desire
to make the story sound good. Facts should be backed-up
by documentation and the sound recollections of several
sources. Unfortunately, virtually all of the early AA members
have passed on. Several of them have left behind recorded
oral histories outlining their experiences.
Classified
Documentation
Many
of these oral histories were recorded during their later
years and as with many people of their age, their memories
may be flawed. Without the written documentation from the
era they refer to, some of the information they spoke about
cannot be verified. However, there is a lot of written documentation
located in the AA Archives' of several Central Offices,
private collections and the Archives at the AA World Service
Office in New York City.
Due
to confidentiality restrictions much of this documentation
has been declared "classified" and as such, made unavailable
to researchers and AA members alike. Bill W. wished for
AA's History to be preserved for future generations of members
of the Fellowship. Bill was never clear as to which generation
or what future he was talking about.
Members
of AA may only view and study materials, which are already
in the public domain. These include published books, magazine
articles and that which has been released by the AA Archives
in their areas or at the National level. Rightfully so,
most researchers have to go through a lengthy process to
study the other materials contained within these archival
repositories. Even then, there are still many documents,
which still remain unavailable.
Due
to the diligent work of many researchers, this new material
which often clarifies some of the inaccuracies contained
in the "official" AA literature, has been brought to the
attention of the AA World Services Office in New York. They
have been given the opportunity to rectify this difference
and have chosen not to.
In
all our affairs?
This
writer has written to the Board of Trustees of AA and to
the Trustee's Archives Committee outlining the results of
our own research and the research of other historians. We
have asked that the history be updated to reflect this new
documentation and have asked that the AA literature be changed
accordingly. Several months have passed and they have chosen
not to respond to our letters.
As
an AA member, this writer has chosen to accept the suggested
Steps and Traditions in my life, as a way of life. The Board
of Trustees are supposed to be the guardians of these same
Steps and Traditions. What we question is why the Board
of Trustees feels itself above, and immune to following
what they were entrusted to be guardians of?
Step
10 of AA states that we, "Continued to take personal inventory
and when we were wrong promptly admitted it." The documentation,
which revealed the inaccuracies show that some of the materials
contained in the "official" literature, was in error. The
Board of Trustees was made aware of these errors. Yet, they
have chosen not to follow the 10th Step and admit to, or
correct these errors.
AA
members are expected to live a life based upon the concept
of rigorous honesty. Why then isn't the Board of Trustees,
as guardians and Trusted Servants expected to do the same?
We
realize that your question as to why there are differences
in the articles from the AA literature has not been fully
answered. We do not have the answer. Only the Board of Trustees
has that answer and they have chosen not to respond. Maybe
you, dear reader, can help us in getting the answer. Ask
your trusted servants why the story cannot be changed to
reflect the truth.
More
will be revealed…
Mitchell
K.
the_archivist@excite.com
|